Meta is approaching its next earnings report with the financial cost of its May layoffs already visible and a new controversy over how far management considered taking its AI-led workforce overhaul. Meta’s second-quarter results recorded $1.18 billion of severance expenses connected with a reduction affecting approximately 8,000 employees, while Reuters has since reported that a broader internal plan to make the company “AI native” ran into resistance, weak agent performance and reliability problems.

The two developments should not be treated as the same event. Meta carried out the announced 8,000-person reduction in May. The more aggressive Project OT planning described by Reuters contemplated shrinking some teams by as much as 60% in two waves, but Chief Executive Officer Mark Zuckerberg halted planning for further cuts shortly before the May round took effect.

Project OT Went Beyond the 8,000 Announced Layoffs

Meta announced in April that it would eliminate about 10% of its workforce, equal to roughly 8,000 jobs, and leave about 6,000 vacancies unfilled. The Associated Press reported that the company presented the cuts as an efficiency measure that would create room for investment in AI infrastructure and highly paid technical talent.

Project OT was broader in design. According to Reuters, the internal initiative explored how AI agents could allow smaller teams to perform the same work, with reductions of up to 60% considered for some groups. That figure did not mean Meta had approved a plan to dismiss 60% of its entire workforce, and the distinction is material given the company’s scale.

The May layoffs proceeded, but the proposed follow-on phase did not. Reuters reported that Zuckerberg stopped further planning after employees pushed back and internal AI systems failed to meet expectations. Meta Chief Technology Officer Andrew Bosworth later described the company’s communication of the vision as “atrocious,” while management reduced pressure on staff to use AI tools whether or not they improved the work.

Zuckerberg subsequently told employees that Meta did not expect more company-wide layoffs during 2026. That assurance does not rule out team-level restructurings, performance-related departures or changes to the plan if the technology improves, but Reuters reported that the Project OT process started earlier this year is no longer active.

The Layoffs Have Already Reached Meta’s Accounts

The next report will matter because the workforce overhaul has already affected both Meta’s costs and the way investors read its headcount. Second-quarter revenue rose 28% from a year earlier to $60.80 billion, but net income fell 14% to $15.85 billion. Total costs and expenses climbed 55% to $42.03 billion, including $2.40 billion of legal charges and the $1.18 billion severance expense.

Meta reported 75,472 employees at the end of June, down only 1% from a year earlier. The figure still included approximately 8,000 people affected by the May reduction, most of whom the company said would no longer appear in reported headcount by the end of the third quarter. The next release should therefore provide the first cleaner measure of the post-layoff workforce.

That update will help investors separate a completed restructuring from the abandoned expansion of Project OT. A lower headcount does not, by itself, show that AI replaced the work successfully. Investors will need to compare staffing, expenses, product output and operational performance before assigning the savings to automation.

The tension extends across the technology sector. Oracle entered earnings with a 21,000-person annual workforce decline and negative free cash flow, while IG began consultations over hundreds of potential cuts as it reorganised its consumer business. Meta’s case carries a different risk because the company reportedly tested AI as part of the operating model before the systems were ready.

AI Spending Leaves Little Room for an Execution Failure

Meta expects 2026 capital expenditure of $130 billion to $145 billion, including principal payments on finance leases. It spent $31.08 billion during the second quarter alone, while operating cash flow of $31.86 billion left only $784 million of free cash flow. That was down 91% from $8.55 billion a year earlier.

The company still had $90.26 billion in cash, cash equivalents and marketable securities at the end of June, against $83.66 billion in long-term debt. Its funding position is therefore very different from a company facing an immediate liquidity crisis, but the narrowing gap between quarterly operating cash flow and capital spending raises the cost of mistakes.

Meta’s infrastructure budget also ties its outlook to the wider AI hardware cycle. FinanceFeeds has examined how high-bandwidth memory supply could determine the 2027 capacity gap and why semiconductor equipment valuations remain tied to AI capital expenditure. Meta is one of the customers turning those supply constraints into revenue for chip and equipment makers.

The spending also feeds a wider argument over the quality and timing of AI returns. FinanceFeeds recently found that part of Nvidia’s reported profit came from investment gains rather than chip sales, while an AI-stock rebound showed how quickly positioning can reverse. For Meta, the test is more direct: whether AI can keep lifting advertising revenue and user engagement faster than infrastructure, compensation and restructuring consume cash.

Reliability Problems Turned Efficiency Into Controversy

The most damaging part of the Reuters account concerns operations rather than morale. Internal data reviewed by the news agency showed 40% more major site-reliability emergencies than a year earlier, while employees spent 70% more time dealing with those events. Reuters linked the increase to a surge in AI-generated code and unpredictable failures involving AI agents.

Those figures are not company guidance or audited financial measures, and Meta has not published them in its investor materials. They still matter because they challenge the central economic case for Project OT. Payroll savings lose value if fewer employees must spend more time correcting failures, protecting live systems or reversing automated output.

The concern arrives as Meta moves AI agents closer to users and sensitive data. The company launched Muse this week as an assistant able to work across email, calendars, payments and other applications. Meta shares rose 6.5% on Wednesday to close at $653.69, showing that investors still respond strongly when the company offers a product route from infrastructure spending to consumer adoption.

That rally does not settle the workforce debate. A consumer agent can become a commercial success even if an internal automation programme failed, and an internal tool can improve later after a weak launch. Earnings will need to give investors enough operating evidence to judge each claim separately.

Late-October Earnings Will Test Three Numbers

Meta has guided for third-quarter revenue of $61 billion to $64 billion. The midpoint of $62.5 billion would represent continued growth from the second quarter, but the market will also examine margins after the legal and severance charges pulled second-quarter operating margin down to 31% from 43% a year earlier. Full-year expenses are expected to reach $165 billion to $169 billion.

The second number is post-reduction headcount. Meta has already said most of the 8,000 affected workers should leave the reported total by quarter-end, making any large variance from that expectation important. Investors will also look for evidence that key technical staff remained after Reuters reported that disruption prompted some employees to search for other jobs.

The third number is free cash flow. Revenue growth remained strong in the second quarter, with ad impressions up 14%, average price per ad up 12% and daily active people across Meta’s apps reaching 3.60 billion. Those operating gains must now support a capital programme that could approach $145 billion this year without forcing another sharp contraction in cash generation.

A widely followed retail-trading calendar currently lists Meta’s next earnings date as October 28, although the company’s investor-relations page has not formally confirmed the date. Meta was the sixth-most-trending symbol on Stocktwits early Thursday, and the platform displayed a bearish sentiment reading of 40 despite the prior session’s rally. That combination of heavy attention and divided sentiment increases the prospect of a large price reaction when the company reports.

Meta’s May layoffs are no longer only a workforce story. They have become a test of whether management can remove cost, spend more than $100 billion on infrastructure and automate internal work without weakening the systems that support its advertising business. The late-October report should reveal the new headcount and the cash result, but management’s explanation of what replaced the lost capacity may carry more weight than either headline number.

This article is for information only and is not investment advice, a recommendation or an offer to buy or sell any security. Market prices change rapidly, and third-party earnings calendars can change before a company confirms its reporting date.